Ryzen 5 7600X vs A4-5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5300
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.88
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 105 Watt
18.43
+1994%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by a whopping 1994% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2449300
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0647.82
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date2 October 2012 (11 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$46 $318

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 7600X has 79600% better value for money than A4-5300.

Detailed specifications

A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed3.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm270 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR3-1600 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, XOP, FMA3, FMA45 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7480DAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5300 0.88
Ryzen 5 7600X 18.43
+1994%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1994% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-5300 1365
Ryzen 5 7600X 28509
+1989%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1989% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-5300 359
Ryzen 5 7600X 2868
+699%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 699% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-5300 505
Ryzen 5 7600X 12824
+2439%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 2439% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-5300 2734
Ryzen 5 7600X 8480
+210%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 210% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5300 4345
Ryzen 5 7600X 49430
+1038%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1038% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5300 2284
Ryzen 5 7600X 17291
+657%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 657% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A4-5300 35.5
Ryzen 5 7600X 2.76
+1186%

A4-5300 outperforms Ryzen 5 7600X by 1186% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A4-5300 1
Ryzen 5 7600X 28
+1853%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1853% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5300 107
Ryzen 5 7600X 2517
+2252%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 2252% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5300 67
Ryzen 5 7600X 314
+369%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 369% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A4-5300 0.91
Ryzen 5 7600X 3.71
+308%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 308% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5300 0.8
Ryzen 5 7600X 13.2
+1510%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1510% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5300 1347
Ryzen 5 7600X 16178
+1101%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1101% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5300 10
Ryzen 5 7600X 148
+1436%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 1436% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5300 50
Ryzen 5 7600X 367
+634%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms A4-5300 by 634% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 18.43
Integrated graphics card 0.72 4.34
Recency 2 October 2012 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 5 7600X is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5300 and Ryzen 5 7600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5300
A4-5300
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 219 votes

Rate A4-5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1730 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5300 or Ryzen 5 7600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.