Xeon Bronze 3206R vs A4-5150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5150M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
Xeon Bronze 3206R
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
6.49
+1059%

Xeon Bronze 3206R outperforms A4-5150M by a whopping 1059% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30141180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.643.05
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)no data
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)1 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.9 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB11 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C78 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-5150M 0.56
Xeon Bronze 3206R 6.49
+1059%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-5150M 927
Xeon Bronze 3206R 10797
+1065%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 6.49
Recency 12 March 2013 1 January 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt

A4-5150M has 142.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3206R, on the other hand, has a 1058.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3206R is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-5150M in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-5150M is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3206R is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
Intel Xeon Bronze 3206R
Xeon Bronze 3206R

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 16 votes

Rate A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3206R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-5150M and Xeon Bronze 3206R, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.