AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs A4-5150M

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1627
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Picasso-U (Zen)
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years old)6 January 2019 (5 years old)
Current price$50 $488

Technical specs

A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1r2FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8350GAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-5150M 765
Ryzen 3 3200U 3823
+400%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 400% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-5150M 2446
Ryzen 3 3200U 4258
+74.1%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 74% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5150M 3589
Ryzen 3 3200U 9284
+159%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 159% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5150M 1881
Ryzen 3 3200U 3755
+99.6%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 100% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A4-5150M 43
Ryzen 3 3200U 14.03
+206%

A4-5150M outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 206% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5150M 101
Ryzen 3 3200U 334
+231%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 231% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5150M 59
Ryzen 3 3200U 129
+118%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 118% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 0.8
Ryzen 3 3200U 2.2
+193%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 193% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 1167
Ryzen 3 3200U 1613
+38.2%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 38% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 42
Ryzen 3 3200U 98
+133%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 133% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5150M 8
Ryzen 3 3200U 20
+144%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 144% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A4-5150M 1739
Ryzen 3 3200U 3282
+88.7%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 89% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A4-5150M 2528
Ryzen 3 3200U 6922
+174%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 174% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A4-5150M 3370
Ryzen 3 3200U 7816
+132%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 132% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A4-5150M 2896
Ryzen 3 3200U 7237
+150%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 150% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A4-5150M 1971
Ryzen 3 3200U 3626
+84%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A4-5150M by 84% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Integrated graphics card 0.78 2.96
Recency 12 March 2013 6 January 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5150M and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate AMD A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1366 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5150M or Ryzen 3 3200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.