Core 2 Duo E6600 vs A4-5150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5150M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
+1.9%

A4-5150M outperforms Core 2 Duo E6600 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31013104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)
Power efficiency0.640.34
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A4-5150M and Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million291 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-5150M 0.53
+1.9%
Core 2 Duo E6600 0.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-5150M 927
+0.9%
Samples: 30
Core 2 Duo E6600 919
Samples: 1555

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-5150M 2446
Core 2 Duo E6600 2462
+0.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-5150M 3589
Core 2 Duo E6600 4698
+30.9%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-5150M 43
Core 2 Duo E6600 36.2
+18.8%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-5150M 1881
Core 2 Duo E6600 2052
+9.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A4-5150M 1
Core 2 Duo E6600 1
+14.4%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A4-5150M 101
Core 2 Duo E6600 117
+15.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A4-5150M 59
Core 2 Duo E6600 62
+4.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A4-5150M 0.8
+341%
Core 2 Duo E6600 0.2

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A4-5150M 8
+1%
Core 2 Duo E6600 8

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A4-5150M 42
Core 2 Duo E6600 43
+1.9%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

A4-5150M 1167
Core 2 Duo E6600 1173
+0.5%

Geekbench 2

A4-5150M 3370
+16.3%
Core 2 Duo E6600 2898

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.52
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

A4-5150M has a 1.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo E6600, on the other hand, has 775% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD A4-5150M and Intel Core 2 Duo E6600.

Be aware that A4-5150M is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E6600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
Core 2 Duo E6600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 16 votes

Rate A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 460 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-5150M and Core 2 Duo E6600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.