5 120UL vs A4-5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.73
Core 5 120UL
2024
10 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
6.03
+726%

Core 5 120UL outperforms A4-5000 by a whopping 726% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29391302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.0516.96
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)8 April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT31700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8330Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-5000 0.73
5 120UL 6.03
+726%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-5000 1283
Samples: 977
5 120UL 10558
+723%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 6.03
Recency 23 May 2013 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

5 120UL has a 726% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core 5 120UL is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-5000 is a notebook processor while Core 5 120UL is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 434 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 120UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-5000 and Core 5 120UL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.