Sempron 3000+ EE SFF vs A4-3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2712not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.00no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Manila (2001−2006)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size228 mm2103 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million81 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410Dno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A4-3400 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 3000+ EE SFF, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3400 and Sempron 3000+ EE SFF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3400
A4-3400
AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF
Sempron 3000+ EE SFF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sempron 3000 EE SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3400 or Sempron 3000+ EE SFF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.