Duo T2600 vs A4-3305M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3305M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
+62.1%
Core Duo T2600
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.29

A4-3305M outperforms Core Duo T2600 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29213125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core Duo
Power efficiency1.270.89
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)5 January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$440

Detailed specifications

A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)0 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size228 mm290 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million151 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V - 1.3V

Compatibility

Information on A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1PPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6480G (593 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3305M 0.47
+62.1%
Duo T2600 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3305M 751
+63.3%
Duo T2600 460

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-3305M 1614
Duo T2600 1765
+9.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.29
Recency 14 June 2011 5 January 2006
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

A4-3305M has a 62.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Duo T2600, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

The A4-3305M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3305M and Core Duo T2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3305M
A4-3305M
Intel Core Duo T2600
Core Duo T2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate A4-3305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Core Duo T2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3305M or Core Duo T2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.