Ryzen AI 9 465 vs A4-3300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3300M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.68
Ryzen AI 9 465
2026
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
13.03
+1816%

Ryzen AI 9 465 outperforms A4-3300M by a whopping 1816% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3001679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.8219.64
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Gorgon Point (2026)
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)January 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size228 mm2233 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5, LPDDR5X

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-3300M 0.68
Ryzen AI 9 465 13.03
+1816%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-3300M 1186
Samples: 277
Ryzen AI 9 465 30473
+2469%
Samples: 8

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-3300M 1742
Ryzen AI 9 465 8554
+391%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-3300M 3417
Ryzen AI 9 465 48569
+1321%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-3300M 40.2
Ryzen AI 9 465 10.5
+283%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 13.03
Integrated graphics card 0.61 18.37
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 465 has a 1816% higher aggregate performance score, 2911% faster integrated GPU, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-3300M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 138 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-3300M and Ryzen AI 9 465, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.