Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs A4-3300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3300M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.82
+1175%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms A4-3300M by a whopping 1175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2617767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)7 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache128 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size226 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1000 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480GAMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300M 0.77
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.82
+1175%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3300M 1186
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15196
+1181%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-3300M 231
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1332
+477%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-3300M 395
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 5040
+1176%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-3300M 1742
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+381%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-3300M 3417
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574
+765%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-3300M 1556
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 11008
+607%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-3300M 40.2
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+918%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A4-3300M 1
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16
+1309%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 9.82
Integrated graphics card 0.66 7.40
Recency 14 June 2011 7 May 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has a 1175.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1021.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300M and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 102 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 151 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M or Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.