Celeron N3350E vs A4-3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2688not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date7 September 2011 (12 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$20 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
Smart Idleno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410DIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 September 2011 1 July 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A4-3300 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3350E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300 and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300
A4-3300
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 102 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300 or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.