EPYC 7313P vs A4-1250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.19
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Milan (2021)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$913
Current price$337 $1591 (1.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1333no data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8210N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-1250 406
EPYC 7313P 42032
+10253%

EPYC 7313P outperforms A4-1250 by 10253% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-1250 97
EPYC 7313P 1358
+1300%

EPYC 7313P outperforms A4-1250 by 1300% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-1250 178
EPYC 7313P 9404
+5183%

EPYC 7313P outperforms A4-1250 by 5183% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 155 Watt

We couldn't decide between A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A4-1250 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1250 and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1250
A4-1250
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 24 votes

Rate A4-1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1250 or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.