Celeron 900 vs A4-1250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-1250
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 8 Watt
0.26

Primary details

Comparing A4-1250 and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31573153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.080.70
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)no data
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-1250 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHzno data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-1250 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1250 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

A4-1250 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1250 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1250 and Celeron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-1250 0.26
Celeron 900 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-1250 406
Celeron 900 412
+1.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-1250 97
Celeron 900 220
+127%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-1250 178
Celeron 900 234
+31.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

A4-1250 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-1250 and Celeron 900.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1250 and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1250
A4-1250
Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 26 votes

Rate A4-1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 56 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1250 or Celeron 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.