Core i7-620M vs A12-9800E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800E
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.24
+75%

A12-9800E outperforms i7-620M by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800E and Core i7-620M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17412194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$105$332
Current price$199 (1.9x MSRP)$254 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800E and Core i7-620M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800E and Core i7-620M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800E and Core i7-620M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A12-9800E and Core i7-620M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800E and Core i7-620M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800E and Core i7-620M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
iGPU core count8no data
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data766 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800E and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800E and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800E and Core i7-620M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800E 2.24
+75%
i7-620M 1.28

A12-9800E outperforms Core i7-620M by 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A12-9800E 3471
+75.3%
i7-620M 1980

A12-9800E outperforms Core i7-620M by 75% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A12-9800E 656
+49.8%
i7-620M 438

A12-9800E outperforms Core i7-620M by 50% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A12-9800E 1512
+84.6%
i7-620M 819

A12-9800E outperforms Core i7-620M by 85% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.24 1.28
Recency 27 July 2017 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Cost $105 $332
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

The A12-9800E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620M in performance tests.

Note that A12-9800E is a desktop processor while Core i7-620M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800E and Core i7-620M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800E
A12-9800E
Intel Core i7-620M
Core i7-620M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 269 votes

Rate Core i7-620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800E or Core i7-620M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.