Xeon X3430 vs A12-9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.34
+57%

A12-9800 outperforms Xeon X3430 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17882143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.76no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.8 GHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Xeon X3430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Xeon X3430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and Xeon X3430 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Xeon X3430.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800 2.34
+57%
Xeon X3430 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9800 3597
+56.9%
Xeon X3430 2293

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A12-9800 705
+84.6%
Xeon X3430 382

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A12-9800 1697
+56.5%
Xeon X3430 1084

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.34 1.49
Recency 27 July 2017 1 July 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

A12-9800 has a 57% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The A12-9800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3430 in performance tests.

Note that A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3430 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and Xeon X3430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800
A12-9800
Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 195 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 138 votes

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800 or Xeon X3430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.