Pentium 2117U vs A12-9720P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9720P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.72
+161%

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19572647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size250 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+

Security technologies

A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U.

PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9720P 1.72
+161%
Pentium 2117U 0.66

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A12-9720P 2666
+161%
Pentium 2117U 1021

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 161% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A12-9720P 526
+72.5%
Pentium 2117U 305

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 72% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A12-9720P 1184
+131%
Pentium 2117U 512

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 131% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A12-9720P 2743
+16%
Pentium 2117U 2365

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A12-9720P 7361
+66.4%
Pentium 2117U 4425

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 66% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A12-9720P 13.01
+211%
Pentium 2117U 40.43

Pentium 2117U outperforms A12-9720P by 211% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A12-9720P 3
+90.6%
Pentium 2117U 1

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 91% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A12-9720P 235
+95.4%
Pentium 2117U 120

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 95% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A12-9720P 73
+25%
Pentium 2117U 58

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 25% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A12-9720P 0.94
+27%
Pentium 2117U 0.74

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 27% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A12-9720P 1.8
+1400%
Pentium 2117U 0.1

A12-9720P outperforms Pentium 2117U by 1400% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.72 0.66
Integrated graphics card 1.95 0.63
Recency 1 June 2016 1 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

A12-9720P has a 160.6% higher aggregate performance score, 209.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

Pentium 2117U, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A12-9720P is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 2117U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9720P and Pentium 2117U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P
Intel Pentium 2117U
Pentium 2117U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 429 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 184 votes

Rate Pentium 2117U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9720P or Pentium 2117U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.