Mobile Pentium 4 532 vs A12-9700P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9700P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.53
+538%
Mobile Pentium 4 532
1 core / 1 thread, 88 Watt
0.24

A12-9700P outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 532 by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21263165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeMobile Pentium 4
Power efficiency9.650.26
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.06 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt88 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9700P 1.53
+538%
Mobile Pentium 4 532 0.24

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A12-9700P 3498
+293%
Mobile Pentium 4 532 891

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 0.24
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 88 Watt

A12-9700P has a 537.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 486.7% lower power consumption.

The A12-9700P is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 532 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9700P and Mobile Pentium 4 532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9700P
A12-9700P
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 532
Mobile Pentium 4 532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 121 vote

Rate A12-9700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9700P or Mobile Pentium 4 532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.