Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs A110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data1.19
Architecture codenameStealey (2007)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)November 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors176 million456 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 437LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 95 Watt

A110 has 3066.7% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q8300, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A110 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and Core 2 Quad Q8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel A110
A110
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate A110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 605 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A110 or Core 2 Quad Q8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.