Celeron M 900 vs A110
Primary details
Comparing A110 and Celeron M 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3402 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.22 |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $70 |
Detailed specifications
A110 and Celeron M 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and Celeron M 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and Celeron M 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Celeron M 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
A110 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.
Celeron M 900, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A110 and Celeron M 900. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and Celeron M 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
