Pentium M 770 vs A10 Pro-7350B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 Pro-7350B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.21
+537%
Pentium M 770
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.19

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Pentium M 770 by a whopping 537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23443244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriPentium M
Power efficiency6.030.67
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)19 January 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz0.01 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size245 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.372V

Compatibility

Information on A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR2
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 Pro-7350B 1.21
+537%
Pentium M 770 0.19

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10 Pro-7350B 2525
+241%
Pentium M 770 740

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.19
Recency 4 June 2014 19 January 2005
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 27 Watt

A10 Pro-7350B has a 536.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 42.1% lower power consumption.

The A10 Pro-7350B is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and Pentium M 770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B
Intel Pentium M 770
Pentium M 770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Pentium M 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Pro-7350B or Pentium M 770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.