Celeron N3450 vs A10 Pro-7350B

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10 Pro-7350B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.22
Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.26
+3.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21912162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date4 June 2014 (9 years ago)1 September 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$338 $242 (2.3x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3, DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 500
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12+
OpenGLno data+
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 Pro-7350B 1.22
Celeron N3450 1.26
+3.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10 Pro-7350B 1921
Celeron N3450 1979
+3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10 Pro-7350B 335
+39.6%
Celeron N3450 240

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 40% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10 Pro-7350B 896
+32.5%
Celeron N3450 676

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 33% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10 Pro-7350B 2004
+41.6%
Celeron N3450 1415

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 42% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10 Pro-7350B 5276
+33.3%
Celeron N3450 3959

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 33% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10 Pro-7350B 2525
Celeron N3450 2576
+2%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 2% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10 Pro-7350B 23.29
Celeron N3450 22.31
+4.4%

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 4% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10 Pro-7350B 2
Celeron N3450 2
+2.2%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10 Pro-7350B 162
+13.3%
Celeron N3450 143

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10 Pro-7350B 55
+23.6%
Celeron N3450 45

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 24% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10 Pro-7350B 0.68
+28.3%
Celeron N3450 0.53

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 28% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 1.2
Celeron N3450 1.2
+4.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 4% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 1484
+45.5%
Celeron N3450 1020

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 45% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 68
+17%
Celeron N3450 58

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 17% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 12
+0.7%
Celeron N3450 12

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 1% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10 Pro-7350B 1449
+20.5%
Celeron N3450 1202

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron N3450 by 21% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10 Pro-7350B 3869
Celeron N3450 3958
+2.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 2% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.22 1.26
Integrated graphics card 0.75
Recency 4 June 2014 1 September 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 6 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron N3450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B
Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 145 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Pro-7350B or Celeron N3450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.