Athlon X2 QL-60 vs A10 Micro-6700T
Aggregate performance score
A10 Micro-6700T outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2552 | 3071 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | 2x AMD Athlon |
| Power efficiency | 18.93 | 0.92 |
| Architecture codename | Mullins (2014) | Lion (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FT3b | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | + |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.90 | 0.34 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 3 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 35 Watt |
A10 Micro-6700T has a 164.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.
The A10 Micro-6700T is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-60 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Micro-6700T and Athlon X2 QL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
