Celeron M 723 vs A10-9700E

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700E and Celeron M 723 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1818	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.43	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron M
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)	1 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	$207	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700E and Celeron M 723 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	3 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	1.2 GHz
Bus support	no data	800 MHz
L2 cache	2048 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Die size	246 mm2	107 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	410 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700E and Celeron M 723 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM4	BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700E and Celeron M 723. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700E and Celeron M 723 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700E and Celeron M 723. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	6	no data
Enduro	+	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700E and Celeron M 723 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700E and Celeron M 723 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700E and Celeron M 723.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 July 2017	1 September 2008
Physical cores	4	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	5 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700E and Celeron M 723, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---