EPYC 7443 vs A10-9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.29
EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
36.59
+1498%

EPYC 7443 outperforms A10-9700 by a whopping 1498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and EPYC 7443 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking172686
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6426.95
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Milan (2021)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90$2,010
Current price$75 (0.8x MSRP)$1423 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7443 has 640% better value for money than A10-9700.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and EPYC 7443 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and EPYC 7443 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 7443. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 7443 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 7443. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and EPYC 7443 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 7443 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 7443.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 2.29
EPYC 7443 36.59
+1498%

EPYC 7443 outperforms A10-9700 by 1498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9700 3548
EPYC 7443 56601
+1495%

EPYC 7443 outperforms A10-9700 by 1495% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 36.59
Recency 27 July 2017 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Cost $90 $2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 7443 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9700 in performance tests.

Note that A10-9700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7443 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and EPYC 7443, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 393 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or EPYC 7443, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.