E1 Micro-6200T vs A10-9700
Primary details
Comparing A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1726 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Mullins (2014) |
| Release date | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | no data |
| Current price | $75 (0.8x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | FT3b |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3.95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1066 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | FMA4 |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | 1 | no data |
| FreeSync | 1 | no data |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | + |
| PowerGating | + | + |
| Out-of-band client management | no data | - |
| VirusProtect | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | 1 |
| IOMMU 2.0 | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
| Enduro | + | + |
| Switchable graphics | no data | 1 |
| UVD | + | + |
| VCE | + | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | 1 | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A10-9700 outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by 491% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 July 2017 | 29 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A10-9700 is a desktop processor while E1 Micro-6200T is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
