E1-7010 vs A10-9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and E1-7010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1826not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency3.25no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and E1-7010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.5 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and E1-7010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and E1-7010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and E1-7010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and E1-7010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3L-1333
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics-+
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and E1-7010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and E1-7010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and E1-7010.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9700 3546
+498%
E1-7010 593

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-9700 646
+409%
E1-7010 127

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-9700 1594
+631%
E1-7010 218

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 7 May 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

A10-9700 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

E1-7010, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-9700 and E1-7010. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-9700 is a desktop processor while E1-7010 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and E1-7010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD E1-7010
E1-7010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 413 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or E1-7010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.