A10-5750M vs Ryzen 3 1300X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1300X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.51
+220%

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12582123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129no data
Current price$60 (0.5x MSRP)$198

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controller
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1300X 4.51
+220%
A10-5750M 1.41

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 1300X 6970
+221%
A10-5750M 2174

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 221% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 1300X 1093
+254%
A10-5750M 309

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 254% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 1300X 3127
+362%
A10-5750M 677

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 362% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 3 1300X 4676
+81.3%
A10-5750M 2579

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 81% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 1300X 16094
+149%
A10-5750M 6451

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 149% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 1300X 6310
+94.9%
A10-5750M 3238

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 95% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 3 1300X 10.8
+108%
A10-5750M 22.5

A10-5750M outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X by 108% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 1300X 6
+176%
A10-5750M 2

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 176% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 1300X 558
+167%
A10-5750M 209

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 167% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 1300X 152
+100%
A10-5750M 76

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 100% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 1300X 1.72
+102%
A10-5750M 0.85

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 102% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 1300X 3
+100%
A10-5750M 1.5

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 100% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 1300X 2677
+31.5%
A10-5750M 2035

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 32% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 1300X 38
+156%
A10-5750M 15

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 156% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 1300X 182
+139%
A10-5750M 76

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 139% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 3 1300X 11803
+138%
A10-5750M 4963

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 138% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 3 1300X 4250
+95.4%
A10-5750M 2175

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms A10-5750M by 95% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.51 1.41
Recency 27 July 2017 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 3 1300X is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5750M in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop processor while A10-5750M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1300X and A10-5750M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 263 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 248 votes

Rate A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1300X or A10-5750M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.