Core 2 Duo U7700 vs A10-9620P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.44
+500%

A10-9620P outperforms Core 2 Duo U7700 by a whopping 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24223461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency4.051.01
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date1 January 2017 (9 years ago)27 July 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size250 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-0.975V

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4P
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-9620P 1.44
+500%
Core 2 Duo U7700 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A10-9620P 2521
+500%
Samples: 182
Core 2 Duo U7700 420
Samples: 25

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-9620P 2277
+70.6%
Core 2 Duo U7700 1335

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-9620P 7420
+195%
Core 2 Duo U7700 2515

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 0.24
Recency 1 January 2017 27 July 2006
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

A10-9620P has a 500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo U7700, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The AMD A10-9620P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700
Core 2 Duo U7700

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 340 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo U7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo U7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.