Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs A10-9600P
Primary details
Comparing A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2157 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
Power efficiency | 9.27 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 36 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FP4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2016 | 4 June 2024 |
Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
Threads | 4 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
A10-9600P has 266.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9600P and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.