Atom x5-Z8350 vs A10-9600P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9600P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.51
+160%

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20502711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$494 $165

Detailed specifications

A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.92 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8no data
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protectionno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-18664 GB
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes81
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9600P 1.51
+160%
Atom x5-Z8350 0.58

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9600P 2343
+163%
Atom x5-Z8350 892

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 163% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9600P 454
+234%
Atom x5-Z8350 136

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 234% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9600P 1026
+174%
Atom x5-Z8350 375

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 174% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-9600P 2447
+171%
Atom x5-Z8350 903

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 171% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-9600P 6508
+118%
Atom x5-Z8350 2979

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 118% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-9600P 15.3
+137%
Atom x5-Z8350 36.2

Atom x5-Z8350 outperforms A10-9600P by 137% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-9600P 3
+120%
Atom x5-Z8350 1

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 120% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9600P 216
+123%
Atom x5-Z8350 97

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 123% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9600P 76
+171%
Atom x5-Z8350 28

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 171% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-9600P 0.9
+150%
Atom x5-Z8350 0.36

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 150% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-9600P 5423
+137%
Atom x5-Z8350 2289

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 137% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-9600P 2074
+173%
Atom x5-Z8350 760

A10-9600P outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 173% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 0.58
Recency 1 June 2016 8 February 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The A10-9600P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9600P and Atom x5-Z8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9600P
A10-9600P
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 303 votes

Rate A10-9600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 356 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9600P or Atom x5-Z8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.