E2-9010 vs A10-9600P

Place in performance ranking	2050	2605
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price	$494	$561

Detailed specifications

A10-9600P and E2-9010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.2 GHz
L2 cache	2048 KB	2048 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Die size	250 mm²	124.5 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	3100 Million	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A10-9600P and E2-9010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FP4	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and E2-9010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8	Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI	1	1
FMA	FMA4	FMA4
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	-	-
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	-
PowerNow	-	-
PowerGating	-	-
Out-of-band client management	-	-
VirusProtect	-	-
RAID	-	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and E2-9010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	1	+
IOMMU 2.0	-	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and E2-9010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3, DDR4-1866	DDR4-1866
Max memory channels	2	1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
iGPU core count	6	2
Enduro	+	+
Switchable graphics	1	1
UVD	+	+
VCE	+	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and E2-9010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9600P and E2-9010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	1	1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and E2-9010.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	8	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9600P 1.51
+113%

E2-9010 0.71

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9600P 2343
+114%

E2-9010 1093

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 114% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-9600P 2447
+30.8%

E2-9010 1871

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 31% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-9600P 6508
+99.1%

E2-9010 3268

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 99% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-9600P 15.3
+143%

E2-9010 37.14

E2-9010 outperforms A10-9600P by 143% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-9600P 3
+130%

E2-9010 1

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 130% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9600P 216
+137%

E2-9010 91

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 137% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9600P 76
+43.4%

E2-9010 53

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 43% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-9600P 0.9
+40.6%

E2-9010 0.64

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 41% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 1.5
+100%

E2-9010 0.8

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 100% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 1526
+98.4%

E2-9010 769

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 98% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 16
+120%

E2-9010 7

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 120% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 85
+118%

E2-9010 39

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9010 by 118% in x264 encoding pass 1.