E2-9000 vs A10-9600P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9600P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.51
+136%

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9600P and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20502669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$494 $78

Detailed specifications

A10-9600P and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9600P and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Single-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,
AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and E2-9000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9600P and E2-9000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and E2-9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9600P 1.51
+136%
E2-9000 0.64

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9600P 2343
+138%
E2-9000 983

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 138% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-9600P 2447
+36.9%
E2-9000 1787

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-9600P 6508
+125%
E2-9000 2897

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 125% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-9600P 3287
+111%
E2-9000 1556

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 111% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-9600P 15.3
+137%
E2-9000 36.23

E2-9000 outperforms A10-9600P by 137% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-9600P 3
+157%
E2-9000 1

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 157% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9600P 216
+157%
E2-9000 84

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 157% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9600P 76
+61.7%
E2-9000 47

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 62% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-9600P 0.9
+52.5%
E2-9000 0.59

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 53% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 1.5
+111%
E2-9000 0.7

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 111% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 1526
+105%
E2-9000 744

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 105% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 16
+159%
E2-9000 6

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 159% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9600P 85
+139%
E2-9000 36

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 139% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-9600P 5423
+133%
E2-9000 2323

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 133% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-9600P 2074
+45%
E2-9000 1430

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 45% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A10-9600P 4711
+98.7%
E2-9000 2371

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 99% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A10-9600P 2047
+32.7%
E2-9000 1543

A10-9600P outperforms E2-9000 by 33% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 0.64
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

The A10-9600P is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9600P and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9600P
A10-9600P
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 303 votes

Rate A10-9600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 303 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9600P or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.