Xeon 6737P vs A10-7860K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7860K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.85
Xeon 6737P
2025
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
45.07
+2336%

Xeon 6737P outperforms A10-7860K by a whopping 2336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking215466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.217.10
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)no data
Release date2 February 2016 (9 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cacheno data144 MB
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C82 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1688

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-7860K 1.85
Xeon 6737P 45.07
+2336%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A10-7860K 3268
Samples: 494
Xeon 6737P 79634
+2337%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.85 45.07
Recency 2 February 2016 1 January 2025
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 270 Watt

A10-7860K has 315.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6737P, on the other hand, has a 2336.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6737P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-7860K in performance tests.

Note that A10-7860K is a desktop processor while Xeon 6737P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7860K
A10-7860K
Intel Xeon 6737P
Xeon 6737P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 79 votes

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6737P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-7860K and Xeon 6737P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.