Ultra 7 265H vs PRO A12-9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1837not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency3.39no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date3 October 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data2
Threads416
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.3 GHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cacheno data24 MB
Chip lithography28 nmno data
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel® Arc™ 140T GPU
iGPU core count8no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data2.3 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.2
OpenGLno data4.6
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes828
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 October 2016 1 January 2025
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 115 Watt

PRO A12-9800 has 76.9% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 265H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800 and Core Ultra 7 265H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800
PRO A12-9800
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Core Ultra 7 265H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 13 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800 or Core Ultra 7 265H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.