A10-4657M vs A10-7300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-7300
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.12
A10-4657M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
1.14
+1.8%

A10-4657M outperforms A10-7300 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A10-7300 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22652259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date4 June 2014 (9 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price$453 $83

Detailed Specifications

A10-7300 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors2410 Million1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-7300 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7300 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7300 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7300 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 7660G
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7300 and A10-4657M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7300 and A10-4657M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7300 and A10-4657M.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7300 1.12
A10-4657M 1.14
+1.8%

A10-4657M outperforms A10-7300 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7300 1736
A10-4657M 1759
+1.3%

A10-4657M outperforms A10-7300 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.12 1.14
Integrated graphics card 1.21
Recency 4 June 2014 1 April 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-7300 and A10-4657M.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7300 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7300
A10-7300
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 74 votes

Rate A10-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7300 or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.