VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs A10-6800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
+328%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 27 Watt
0.47

A10-6800K outperforms VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19332932
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)VIA
Power efficiency1.901.62
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)CNQ (2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache192 KB512 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size246 mm2132 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2BGA
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt27.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.01
+328%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 0.47

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-6800K 4885
+202%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 0.47
Recency 1 June 2013 17 May 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 27 Watt

A10-6800K has a 327.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, on the other hand, has 270.4% lower power consumption.

The A10-6800K is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 440 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.