Core i7-620UM vs A10-6800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.06
+217%

A10-6800K outperforms i7-620UM by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18222651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.42no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$278
Current price$109 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-800
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670DIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Number of pipelines384no data
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.06
+217%
i7-620UM 0.65

A10-6800K outperforms Core i7-620UM by 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-6800K 3186
+215%
i7-620UM 1010

A10-6800K outperforms Core i7-620UM by 215% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-6800K 3428
+62.4%
i7-620UM 2111

A10-6800K outperforms Core i7-620UM by 62% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-6800K 10077
+152%
i7-620UM 4004

A10-6800K outperforms Core i7-620UM by 152% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 0.65
Recency 1 June 2013 4 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Cost $142 $278
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 18 Watt

The A10-6800K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620UM in performance tests.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while Core i7-620UM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Core i7-620UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 409 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 12 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Core i7-620UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.