Iris Graphics 48 vs A10-6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1835not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Gen9
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)no data
Current price$48 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz0.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVXno data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-6700 is a desktop processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6700
A10-6700
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 232 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6700 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.