A6-5200 vs A10-5800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5800K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.91
+76.9%

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5800K and A6-5200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18812319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.20no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date2 October 2012 (11 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data
Current price$73 (0.6x MSRP)$421

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-5800K and A6-5200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-5800K and A6-5200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FT3
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5800K and A6-5200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600
AES-NIno data+
FMAno dataFMA4
AVXno data+
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and A6-5200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and A6-5200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7660DAMD Radeon HD 8400
Number of pipelinesno data128
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-5800K and A6-5200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-5800K and A6-5200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5800K and A6-5200.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5800K 1.91
+76.9%
A6-5200 1.08

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-5800K 2961
+77.9%
A6-5200 1664

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 78% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-5800K 449
+114%
A6-5200 210

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 114% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-5800K 1089
+82.4%
A6-5200 597

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 82% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-5800K 3094
+93.6%
A6-5200 1598

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 94% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5800K 9276
+65.6%
A6-5200 5600

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 66% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5800K 4464
+67.9%
A6-5200 2660

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 68% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-5800K 15.9
+64.2%
A6-5200 26.1

A6-5200 outperforms A10-5800K by 64% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-5800K 3
+74.7%
A6-5200 2

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 75% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-5800K 1.03
+98.1%
A6-5200 0.52

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 98% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5800K 1.9
+81%
A6-5200 1.1

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 81% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5800K 2501
+117%
A6-5200 1152

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 117% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5800K 22
+91.7%
A6-5200 11

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 92% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5800K 107
+106%
A6-5200 52

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 106% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-5800K 6957
+86.3%
A6-5200 3735

A10-5800K outperforms A6-5200 by 86% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.08
Integrated graphics card 1.30 0.69
Recency 2 October 2012 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

The A10-5800K is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5200 in performance tests.

Note that A10-5800K is a desktop processor while A6-5200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800K and A6-5200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5800K
A10-5800K
AMD A6-5200
A6-5200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 456 votes

Rate A10-5800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 185 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5800K or A6-5200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.