Celeron 6205 vs A10-5800B
Primary details
Comparing A10-5800B and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1929 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (11 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-5800B and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-5800B and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM2 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800B and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800B and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 7660D | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.30 | 4.48 |
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
A10-5800B has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 244.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-5800B and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A10-5800B is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800B and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
