EPYC 7543 vs A10-5757M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5757M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.94
EPYC 7543
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
38.34
+1876%

EPYC 7543 outperforms A10-5757M by a whopping 1876% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5757M and EPYC 7543 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195976
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.04
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.2416.12
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,761

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-5757M and EPYC 7543 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-5757M and EPYC 7543 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5757M and EPYC 7543. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5757M and EPYC 7543 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5757M and EPYC 7543. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8650G (600 - 720 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5757M and EPYC 7543.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5757M 1.94
EPYC 7543 38.34
+1876%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5757M 3084
EPYC 7543 60901
+1875%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.94 38.34
Recency 1 June 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

A10-5757M has 542.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543, on the other hand, has a 1876.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7543 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5757M in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-5757M is a notebook processor while EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5757M and EPYC 7543, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5757M
A10-5757M
AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 46 votes

Rate A10-5757M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5757M or EPYC 7543, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.