AMD A10-5745M vs A9-9425

General info

Comparing A10-5745M and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
 
Type
Laptop
 
Laptop
Series
AMD A-Series
 
AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename
Richland
 
Stoney Ridge
Release date
1 June 2013
 
1 June 2016

Technical specs

A10-5745M and A9-9425 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A10-5745M and A9-9425 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
4
 
2
Number of threads
4
 
2
Base frequency
2.1 GHz
 
3.1 GHz
Maximum frequency
2.9 GHz
 
3.7 GHz
L1 cache
128 KB (per core)
 
no data
L2 cache
1 MB (per core)
 
1 MB
Manufacturing process technology
32 nm
 
28 nm
Die size
246 mm2
 
124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature
no data
 
90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
71 °C
 
no data
Transistor count
1,178 million
 
1200 Million
64 bit support
+
 
+

Compatibility

Information on A10-5745M and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
1
 
no data
Socket
FP2
 
BGA
Power consumption (TDP)
25 Watt
 
10-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5745M and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI
+
 
-
FMA
+
 
-
AVX
+
 
-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5745M and A9-9425 are enumerated here.
AMD-V
+
 
+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A10-5745M and A9-9425.
Supported memory types
DDR3 Dual-channel
 
no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A10-5745M and A9-9425.
Integrated graphics
 
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A10-5745M and A9-9425. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A10-5745M 1.77 +1.1%
A9-9425 1.75

3DMark06 CPU

A10-5745M 2745 +18.6%
A9-9425 2314

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

A10-5745M 2065
A9-9425 2686 +30.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

A10-5745M 5480 +26.3%
A9-9425 4338

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

A10-5745M 0.69
A9-9425 0.9 +30.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

A10-5745M 1.9 +26.7%
A9-9425 1.5

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

A10-5745M 64
A9-9425 76 +18.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

A10-5745M 177 +41.6%
A9-9425 125

wPrime 32

A10-5745M 34.97
A9-9425 25.83 +35.4%

WinRAR 4.0

A10-5745M 1585 +77.9%
A9-9425 891

x264 encoding pass 1

A10-5745M 62 +21.6%
A9-9425 51

x264 encoding pass 2

A10-5745M 13 +30%
A9-9425 10

TrueCrypt AES

A10-5745M 1 +0%
A9-9425 1

Geekbench 2

A10-5745M 4259
A9-9425 4518 +6.1%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

A10-5745M 1476
A9-9425 2039 +38.1%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

A10-5745M 3724 +12.1%
A9-9425 3323

Passmark

A10-5745M 1569 +0.9%
A9-9425 1555

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A10-5745M and A9-9425 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A10-5745M

1.1% faster in synthetic tests
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
FMA4
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
AES-NI save

Advantages of AMD A9-9425

Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 1 June 2013)
Higher maximum frequency (3700 vs 2900 MHz)
Higher base frequency (3100 vs 2100 MHz)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 32 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 25 watts)

So, A10-5745M or A9-9425?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A10-5745M and AMD A9-9425. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5745M and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A10-5745M
AMD A9-9425
Like
Like

User rating

Here are CPU ratings given by our user. You can rate both processors yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5745M or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
AliExpress WW