Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs 3015Ce
Aggregate performance score
3015Ce outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6600 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2265 | 2387 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 20.82 | 1.04 |
| Architecture codename | Pollock (Zen) (2020) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| Release date | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
3015Ce and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FT5 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.32 | 1.15 |
| Recency | 4 August 2020 | no data |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 105 Watt |
3015Ce has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2020 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1650% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Quad Q6600, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
The 3015Ce is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6600 in performance tests.
Be aware that 3015Ce is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q6600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
