Tesla M40 24 GB vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Place in performance ranking	26	187
Place by popularity	81	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.34	32.73
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code name	Ampere GA104	GM200
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2021 (2 years ago)	10 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$757 (1.3x MSRP)	$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M40 24 GB has 34% better value for money than RTX 3070 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6144	3072
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1112 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	290 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	339.8	213.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	19000 MHz	6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	608.3 GB/s	288.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Ti 61.15
+127%

Tesla M40 24 GB 26.92

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti outperforms Tesla M40 24 GB by 127% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3070 Ti 23661
+127%

Tesla M40 24 GB 10417

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti outperforms Tesla M40 24 GB by 127% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	188 +135%	80−85 −135%
1440p	103 +129%	45−50 −129%
4K	67 +148%	27−30 −148%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

174

+132%

75−80
−132%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +136%	45−50 −136%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +128%	65−70 −128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	160−170 +129%	70−75 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	138 +130%	60−65 −130%
Far Cry 5	205 +128%	90−95 −128%
Far Cry New Dawn	173 +131%	75−80 −131%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +129%	75−80 −129%
Hitman 3	190−200 +138%	80−85 −138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +142%	55−60 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	231 +131%	100−105 −131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +133%	45−50 −133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +136%	45−50 −136%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +128%	65−70 −128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	160−170 +129%	70−75 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	121 +142%	50−55 −142%
Far Cry 5	196 +131%	85−90 −131%
Far Cry New Dawn	166 +137%	70−75 −137%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +129%	75−80 −129%
Hitman 3	190−200 +138%	80−85 −138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +142%	55−60 −142%
Metro Exodus	145 +142%	60−65 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200 +135%	85−90 −135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	292 +143%	120−130 −143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +133%	45−50 −133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +136%	45−50 −136%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +128%	65−70 −128%
Cyberpunk 2077	111 +147%	45−50 −147%
Far Cry 5	183 +129%	80−85 −129%
Far Cry New Dawn	148 +128%	65−70 −128%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +129%	75−80 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 +145%	60−65 −145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +133%	45−50 −133%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +142%	45−50 −142%
Hitman 3	130−140 +136%	55−60 −136%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +145%	40−45 −145%
Metro Exodus	89 +154%	35−40 −154%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	134 +144%	55−60 −144%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +148%	27−30 −148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +147%	30−33 −147%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +132%	50−55 −132%
Cyberpunk 2077	73 +143%	30−33 −143%
Far Cry 5	150 +131%	65−70 −131%
Far Cry New Dawn	135 +145%	55−60 −145%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +130%	60−65 −130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +138%	45−50 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +133%	27−30 −133%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +141%	27−30 −141%
Hitman 3	70−75 +140%	30−33 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +130%	27−30 −130%
Metro Exodus	56 +133%	24−27 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	73 +143%	30−33 −143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109 +142%	45−50 −142%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +157%	14−16 −157%
Far Cry 5	82 +134%	35−40 −134%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +138%	40−45 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti and Tesla M40 24 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti is 135% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti is 129% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti is 148% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	61.15	26.92
Recency	31 May 2021	10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	290 Watt	250 Watt