Tesla M2090 vs i752

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.70
ArchitectureGeneration 1.0 (1998−2002)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePortolaGF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 April 1999 (26 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed100 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.141.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs164
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed133 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.064 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 1999 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm

Tesla M2090 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between i752 and Tesla M2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that i752 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate i752 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about i752 or Tesla M2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.