GMA X4500 vs Zhongshan Subor Z+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameFenghuangEaglelake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 August 2018 (7 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153680
Core clock speed1300 MHz533 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate124.82.132
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs964

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0
Shader Model6.24.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2018 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 13 Watt

Zhongshan Subor Z+ has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 669.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Zhongshan Subor Z+ and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Zhongshan Subor Z+ is a notebook graphics card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Zhongshan Subor Z+
Zhongshan Subor Z+
Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Zhongshan Subor Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 362 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Zhongshan Subor Z+ or GMA X4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.