Radeon Pro W6900X vs Xe DG1 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.34
Power efficiencyno data10.69
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameDG1Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data3 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6405120
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2150 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate62.00688.0
Floating-point processing power1.984 TFLOPS22.02 TFLOPS
ROPs20128
TMUs40320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length178 mm267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4.3 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

Xe DG1 OEM has 900% lower power consumption.

Pro W6900X, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xe DG1 OEM and Radeon Pro W6900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xe DG1 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Xe DG1 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xe DG1 OEM or Radeon Pro W6900X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.