UHD Graphics 770 vs Xe Arctic Sound

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.11
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameArctic SoundRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data27 September 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096256
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate230.426.40
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs1288
TMUs25616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 3233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe Arctic Sound and UHD Graphics 770. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1488 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xe Arctic Sound or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.