RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Xe Arctic Sound

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.28
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameArctic SoundAD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409612800
Core clock speed900 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate230.41,020
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs128176
TMUs256400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100
L1 Cacheno data12.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB32 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe Arctic Sound and RTX 5000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xe Arctic Sound is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 95 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xe Arctic Sound or RTX 5000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.