GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs Xe Arctic Sound

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameArctic SoundAD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)March 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40965888
Core clock speed900 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4455.4
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs256184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB12 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/s1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s504.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 200 Watt

Xe Arctic Sound has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4070 AD103, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe Arctic Sound and GeForce RTX 4070 AD103. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Xe Arctic Sound
Xe Arctic Sound
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.