ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs Xbox One S GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameDurango 2RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (9 years ago)25 October 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed914 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate43.871.300
Floating-point processing power1.404 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs484

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGLN/A2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 25 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 30 Watt

Xbox One S GPU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory, on the other hand, has 216.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One S GPU and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox One S GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 193 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xbox One S GPU or Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.